eye of the beholder essays

eye of the beholder essays The theme of the book, Eye of the Beholder, by Jayne Ann Krentz, is to stop and take a breath before jumping to conclusions. Twelve years ago, Trask's father was killed in a car accident. He had driven his car off Avalon Point. Because of the sharp curve, this was not unusual. Everyone in town just believed that Trask's father was another fatality. Trask knew it was more. He believed his father's death was murder. Trask believed Kenyon had killed his father because of a business deal gone bad. Trask's father, Kenyon, and Guthrie had been working on the deal for months. Trask's father had found a problem and believed the plan would cause the men to go bankrupt. With this information, Trask's father decided to take his money and get out of the deal. Immediately after Trask found out about his father's death, he went to Kenyon's home. Trask went with his gun in hand. He wasn't sure of his own plans; he only knew that someone was going to pay for his father's death. Probably for the best of them all, Alexa walked into the room in time to see Trask pull out his gun. Trask left when Alexa got to the phone and threatened to call the police. The opening of the newest of the Avalon hotel chain couldn't have been planned more perfectly. Trask knew it was perfect. He had been in the business for years and was quite good. So far, all of his hotel's had been a great success. He was unsure of this one though. Most of the town believed that if Trask ever did come back, it would be for revenge. Trask had left the night of his father's death and hadn't been seen since. Many had heard of the successful business man he had become and praised him for it. The night of the opening ceremony, Alexa was upstairs by herself. She knew Trask would be at the hotel and had done her best to avoid him. Everyone in town believed Trask was back for revenge and had chosen this sight for a hotel as an excuse. Alexa felt she would ...

Shakespeares Richard III essays

Shakespeares Richard III essays Richard III is considered one of Shakespeares most evil characters, one endowed with sharp wit and lacking in morals, who governs through fear and force. Richard III deals extensively with the themes of political corruption and dissimulation. Richard's reign is portrayed as a period in which nothing is sacred; neither on a political or social level, nor on a personal one. Richard will stop at nothing, not even at betraying his friends and murdering his kin, in order to become king. Although his traits of character are clearly illustrated through his deeds and words, Shakespeare provides the reader with an important contrast to the character of the king, namely the women of the play. These women are: the Duchess of York, Richard's mother; Anne who later becomes Richard's wife; Queen Margaret who was the former queen and Richard's arch enemy, and Queen Elizabeth, the current queen. Also, Queen Elizabeths daughter, Elizabeth, is present in the plot but the reader is never introduced to her. Richard appears one-dimensionally evil, a flat character, the embodiment of evil and moral decay. His evil ambitions are expressed at the outset of the play; his purpose is to deepen the chaos in the kingdom and ultimately become king. He is portrayed through the eyes of the characters, especially the women in the play. Anne, Elizabeth, the Duchess of York and Margaret are voices of protest and morality who condemn the actions of the king, and are able to see through his intrigues, and at times, even to foresee the consequences of his acts. In fact, the four women are used as voices of the Elizabethan age in the sense that they provide an extraordinary example of the world view belonging to that particular era in the history of England. Not only do these women point out moral truths, but they also ask for divine retribution and point to a higher moral authority which transcends the realm of human action. These women illustrate how moral ...

Relationship between Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Essay - 2

Relationship between Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Development - Essay Example Such an analytical approach has furnished ample insight into the interrelationship existing between knowledge, innovation and entrepreneurship. However, it goes without saying that there is a lacuna as to the understanding of the comprehensive relationship between entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth. The understanding of the relationships between micro economic sources of growth and the consequent macroeconomic outcomes is still too nascent as to the establishment of the relationships between varied interacting forces impacting the economic growth. Hence, in an academic perspective it will be really enlightening to analyze the recent advancements into the understanding of the varied forces influencing the creation of knowledge, the promulgation and diffusion of this knowledge aided by apt innovation and the role played by entrepreneurship in the overall growth process. For its goes without saying that the primary process of knowledge creation has to be continually and co mmensurately supported by forces originating from innovation and entrepreneurship, which give way to mechanisms that help in the conversion of this knowledge to societal and commercial needs. It is amply relevant as the developing countries of today could learn a lot from the course followed by the developed countries in their quest for economic growth. It will also immensely help the developed countries in the sense that they are faced with the challenging responsibility of devising growth policies in a futuristic context. Thus, it is emphatically valid to attempt an understanding into the relationship existing between entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth. Entrepreneurship and Economic Development The very fact that entrepreneurship is closely tied to economic growth is amply corroborated by the commonsensical observation and economic acumen in the sense that the crux of any innovative entrepreneurial endeavour is to convert ideas and knowledge into commercially valid e conomic opportunities. Entrepreneurship is the bedrock on which rest the possibilities for innovation, change and growth. In a world economy that is getting globalized at a fast pace, entrepreneurship is a sources of competitiveness in the sense that it gives way to knowledge and flexibility. With the ensuing shift in the industrial frameworks and structures vying for an augmented decentralization and minimal concentration, the entrepreneurial vigour operating at all the levels in an economy is indeed a source of viable competitiveness. In that context if one takes into consideration the accompanying technological developments and changes and a resultant augmenting global competition and economic liberalization, the very assumption that promoting entrepreneurship in a way leads to the promotion of the economic growth appears more valid today than it did in the past. The available economic, social and psychological knowledge do points towards the fact that entrepreneurship is a proce ss that tends to be dynamic in its scope and ramifications. Though some experts may tend to think of entrepreneurship as a mechanical economic factor, yet, in reality it is far from being so (Pirich 2001, p. 14). Entrepreneurship has as much to do with change as with the choices related to a change era or process. In that context, the existing definitions of entrepreneurship delve on the functional aspects of entrepreneurship that may be allocation of the scarce resources, coordination, making decisions, innovation, capital augmentation and uncertainty management. Entrepreneurship unleashes the dormant growth